![]() ![]() Quote:There are gradient options that will only follow the selection regardless of how you draw the start and end points. Quote:Always better if you give the version of Gimp and OS that you are using. The bump map gives interesting results, and may be used, but it still doesn't give me a gradient that espouses certain shapes not present in the gradient tool option.ĮDIT: Yes, the outline without anti-aliasis was deliberate. And it seems to me to go from the center outwards, while I was looking more for, like in the image below, something was went from the bottom of the curve and following it. I tried the Shaped(angular) option but I cannot find the center point slider, as soon as I drag the line to make the gradient, it just does it (always the same no matter where it is). The Azimuth value determines the light direction. Try a bump map Filters -> Map -> Bump Map and use the filled shape as its own bumpmap. The FG / BG colours do matter, experiment.Ī bit more shape / shading. There is a center point slider, find it and drag to near one end. The sort of fill shown you can get from the gradient tool with the Shaped(angular) option but it needs adjusting. Quote: Filling a selection with a gradient. The second problem is that I was wondering if there was a more efficient/clean way of doing the clearer outline between the darkest part of the shading and the thicker, darker outline, using Gimp than simply manually drawing it using the brush tool. Additionally, sometimes the gradient (if I draw small lines using the tool) produces very stark differences, without nice transitions, and doesn't seem blurry enough. The gradient tool in Gimp has some options, but I wasn't able to make a curved gradient out of these (I don't really understand what most of the options do outside of linear), so I was wondering if there were other ways to go about replicating such an effect, or if I'm missing something. The first problem is that I can't seem too replicate the sort of customized curved gradient shown in the image. Last edited by doronf2 on Mon 2:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.I'm fairly new at using Gimp (and art programs in general), and while working on a project, I've had difficulty replicating two particular visuals effects found, for example, in the picture below. I'm perfectly willing to believe this is operator error, but I have absolutely no idea what the error could be, or how I can so perfectly reproduce it across three different installations of the program.Īny help anyone can offer will be much appreciated. As far as i can tell, absolutely nothing has happened. There is no gradient from foreground to background or background to foreground or anything. The white mask icon to the right of the layer image icon disappears. It seems to draw the mask as I would want it, fading the foreground image seamlessly into the background image. ![]() Then, using the gradient/blend tool, draw a line from one part of the masked area to another, where I want the mask to end and begin. (Or BG-FG, or the BG-transparent or FG-transparent options - again, doesn't matter, as things work out.)Ĭlick on the white square that appears next to the layer image icon to activate the mask as selected. I choose the "Add layer mask" option, and in the Tools panel, option FG-BG (RGB). Then I either select an area or else choose to work on the image as a whole - doesn't matter, as it turns out. Then take another image and add that as another layer. What happens is this: I take one image and put it into Gimp as a layer. I'm using the 64-bit version of all three versions of GIMP 2.10. I'm having a really odd problem with 2.10, both the Samj portable and the Partha portable on Windows 7, and with the Partha standard on Windows 10. OS Version: Windows 7, Windows 10, both 64-bit ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |